Re: [boost] Review Wizard Report for May 2010

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Wizard Report for May 2010
From: Ronald Garcia (rxg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-27 11:33:12

Thanks Joel.

Ion, have the docs for the Container library moved?

Ron

On May 26, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Klaim wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to point that the documentation for the Container  
> library
> seems to be missing (
> http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/move/libs/container/doc/html/index.html
> ).
>
> Joël Lamotte
>
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 23:00, vicente.botet  
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]>
>> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 7:12 PM
>> Subject: Re: [boost] Review Wizard Report for May 2010
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 5/26/2010 12:36 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
>>>>> The following libraries have been accepted to Boost, but have  
>>>>> not yet
>>>>> been submitted to SVN:
>>>>>
>>>>> * Time Series (accepted August 2007).
>>>>> * Floating Point Utilities (accepted March 2008).
>>>>
>>>> I guess the authors and the RMs of these two libraries have  
>>>> forgotten
>> these libraries were accepted.
>>>> Time Series Eric Niebler John R. Phillips
>>>
>>> Not forgotten. I've announced publicly on this list that the review
>>> feedback was overwhelming and raised open-ended design issues that I
>>> probably wouldn't have the resources to address. IIRC, John Phillips
>>> took up the mantle, but I haven't heard anything further. I  
>>> suppose that
>>> puts Time_series in the orphaned library catalog. It probably  
>>> belongs
>>> back in the sandbox and should get another (mini?)review should it  
>>> ever
>>> be completed.
>>>
>>>>> * Phoenix (accepted provisionally September 2008)
>>>>
>>>> Will we need to wait for a Phoenix that uses Proto?
>>>
>>> This is under active construction. As of BoostCon, we have a  
>>> technical
>>> solution for the universal placeholders problem, and we're working  
>>> on
>>> the extensibility hooks now. Once we settle on those, the rest  
>>> should
>>> come fairly quickly.
>>
>> Thanks for the informations. Is there a place  where all these  
>> informations
>> can be associated to the state of an accepted library but not yet  
>> released,
>> maybe the wiki?
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost