Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-03 13:27:44

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry Golubiewski" <tjgolubi_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1

> 
> Vicente wrote:
>> The typed interface exists already on the Beman's library. Thus I don't 
>> see any need to reimplement it. Do you?
> 
> Beman's approach is integer centric and combines the use of 
> non-natively-sized integers and endianness.
> I would like to see Beman's library split into two parts: the integer part 
> and the endian-part.

I agree.

Beman, what do you think about this split?

Best,
Vicente