Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1

Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-04 10:15:45

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stewart, Robert" <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1

> 
> Vicente Botet wrote:
>> Rob Stewart wrote:
>> > Scott McMurray wrote:
>> >> On 4 June 2010 09:20, Stewart, Robert
>> <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > "endian_pack" doesn't suggest the class' actual purpose
>> >>
>> >> I'd guess that pack was chosen thinking of the verb, like the perl
>> >> function pack: <http://perldoc.perl.org/functions/pack.html>.
>> >
>> > Perhaps, but while function names are rightly verbs, type
>> > names should be nouns.
>>
>> So the noum shoud be?
> 
> I suggested some in another reply.

Please could you repeate it here, I don't remember which one of your suggestion used the noum for pack.

Vicente