Re: [boost] [function_types] is there an equivalent for functors?

Subject: Re: [boost] [function_types] is there an equivalent for functors?
From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-05 16:39:48

On 10-07-05 4:14 PM, Edd Dawson wrote:
> On 7/5/2010 8:52 PM, Sohail Somani wrote:
>> On 10-07-05 2:33 PM, Edd Dawson wrote:
>>
>> A comment in this post on my blog has a good generic solution:
>>
>>
>> http://uint32t.blogspot.com/2008/11/using-boost-bind-and-boost-function.html
>>
>
> Yep, I'm pretty much at exactly the same stage now that you got to :)

Oh, it sounds like you are much farther ahead!

>> The only issue with it as far as I can see is that it requires exact
>> type matches.
>
> Yeah. I've got an optional check using QMetaObject::checkConnectArgs
> that the signal/slot parameters do indeed match. I composed the slot
> signature string using some std::type_info/demangling hackery for the
> platforms I'm interested in.

Is that necessary? I'm not sure.

>> Would love to see you take that further :) It essentially
>> mimics what moc would generate.
>
> If you're interested, I could put up a repo? It's functional already,
> just polishing now...

For sure!