Subject: Re: [boost] Concept Traits Library
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-10 11:47:51
> Even if the library doesn't provides an approach that works to define all
> the concepts, it has a lot of useful things. I also suggested to Terje at
> least to add the mpl and type traits extensions of the library.
Agreed - in fact I don't see why we can't just add the new traits direct to
the type_traits library?
Certainly if someone would like to package these up as direct additions to
type_traits (so I don't have to do much!) then I'd certainly look favorably
on adding them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk