Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Pointer Plus Bits Behavior and Interface
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-16 00:48:43
On 15 July 2010 21:00, Andrew Sutton <andrew.n.sutton_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I would think that the point of creating this particular data type
> (pointer_plus_bits) was to emphasize the pointer aspect and less so the
I think that's a point-of-view difference. When I heard of it, I
immediately thought of "compressed pair with non-empty things".
But all three work. If you're implementing a red-black tree, the
interesting part is the bits, not the fact that you have pointers.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk