Subject: Re: [boost] New name of bjam.exe
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-20 13:46:16
On 7/20/2010 1:06 PM, John Maddock wrote:
>>> For those reasons, Rene and I have decided that "bjam.exe" should go.
>>> We're thinking
>>> about naming the executable simply "build.exe", since no other build
>>> tool bothered to
>>> take it.
>> The name bjam is no doubt hard-coded in many build scripts and
>> renaming it will create a lot of unnecessary bugs.
> Good point.
+1 for leaving it "bjam". This is silly.
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk