Subject: Re: [boost] New name of bjam.exe
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-20 14:08:13
On 7/20/2010 1:54 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote
>> There's nothing silly here. We're solving a real problem that confuses
>> real users.
I think it's more confusing that our build files are called 'jamfile'
and '*.jam'. 'bjam' is pretty meaningless.
On 20 July 2010 18:58, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Then I vote for Robert's suggestion: CLEARBS
If you don't want to read this thread then ignore it and it'll go
away. There's no need to be crabby.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk