Subject: Re: [boost] New name of bjam.exe
From: Sohail Somani (sohail_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-20 19:39:12
On 10-07-20 4:45 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> For those reasons, Rene and I have decided that "bjam.exe" should go. We're thinking
> about naming the executable simply "build.exe", since no other build tool bothered to
> take it.
> Does anybody have comments, or better suggestions?
How about "boostb" for Boost Build? We type "boost" many times a day and
"boostb" is probably the most efficient name possible. Unlike Robert, I
don't use the command history for builds so something typing friendly
would be appreciated.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk