Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta progress?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-22 00:54:48
Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 7/21/2010 7:46 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
>> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>> Eric Niebler wrote:
>>>> So, does your fix require users to change their archive classes or
>> I forgot to answer this.
>> Users of the archives included with the library shouldn't have
>> to change a thing.
>> Users who make their own archive classes (like mpi) might
>> have to make a minor change.
> Thank you. So the answers I posited to Ryan's questions were correct
> Regarding the minor change that users may have to make to their own
> archive classes, will the fact that a change needs to be made be
> flagged at compile time? Is there anything you can do to make faulty
> classes fail to compile?
The change manifests itself as a failure to compile.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk