Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta progress?

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta progress?
From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-24 09:34:37

On 24 Jul 2010, at 00:19, Robert Ramey wrote:

> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> On 7/23/2010 11:31 PM, Matthias Troyer wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 23 Jul 2010, at 18:11, Robert Ramey wrote:
>>> 
>>>> [snip]
>>>> Robert Ramey
>>> 
>>> Let me summarize concisely:
>> <snip>
>> 
>> Guys, we're trying to get a release out. IIUC, a course of action has
>> already been chosen: Robert is to add back the public default
>> constructors that were causing MPI to fail. What's the status of that?
>> Has it in fact fixed the problem on release?
>> 
>> Let's get the release out first. Then you guys can bicker. ;-)
> 
> I don't think it's fair to characterize this as bickering. It's a real
> and difficult problem that can't really be solved to everyone's
> total satisfaction.

I think this could be solved satisfactorily if you could make a list of all primitive types that an archive has to support, and specify which concepts once can assume for those types.

Matthias