Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta progress?
From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-24 09:34:37
On 24 Jul 2010, at 00:19, Robert Ramey wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> On 7/23/2010 11:31 PM, Matthias Troyer wrote:
>>> On 23 Jul 2010, at 18:11, Robert Ramey wrote:
>>>> Robert Ramey
>>> Let me summarize concisely:
>> Guys, we're trying to get a release out. IIUC, a course of action has
>> already been chosen: Robert is to add back the public default
>> constructors that were causing MPI to fail. What's the status of that?
>> Has it in fact fixed the problem on release?
>> Let's get the release out first. Then you guys can bicker. ;-)
> I don't think it's fair to characterize this as bickering. It's a real
> and difficult problem that can't really be solved to everyone's
> total satisfaction.
I think this could be solved satisfactorily if you could make a list of all primitive types that an archive has to support, and specify which concepts once can assume for those types.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk