Re: [boost] [fusion] [intro] ADAPT_STRUCT extensions

Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] [intro] ADAPT_STRUCT extensions
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-13 06:10:23

Zitat von Joel de Guzman <joel_at_[hidden]>:

>> finding a name for this feature along the line of "define sequence from
>> expressions" would also reduce the number of macros. I don't think the
>> SUB-/DERIVED variants I proposed are needed for this.
>
> C'mon guys! We're venturing into the name-game land!
> If that's the game, then we should shout out why C++ confusingly
> has "struct" and "class" anyway which both have very little nuance.
> I don't want to go there. Sorry. This is not going to be another
> bike-shed issue.

the name caused both david and me to fundamentally misunderstand the  
macro, and I'm supposed to explain to the library user that it is the  
absolute wrong thing to do to adapt a class using ADAPT_CLASS.

that's a lot of confusion for a still undocumented bike-shed.