Subject: [boost] Re: : [chrono] v0.4.5 Documentation update + warnings +removal +ug fixes
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-13 13:11:39
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roland Bock" <rbock_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] ï¿½
> On 2010-08-13 10:17, vicente.botet wrote:
>> We can consider that the current package has 4 libraries:
>> * common_type for type_traits
>> * ratio
>> * chrono
>> * stropwatches
> Meaning that if it is accepted into boost there will actually be three
> new libraries (ratio, chrono, stopwatches)?
This is a matter of choice. Clearly common_type should goes to the TypeTraits library.
ratio could be included as a standalone library. Whether chrono and stopwatches are separated is up to us. If the boost community consider that it is better to package them as three separated libraries, I will do the break. Do the community considers that the break need to be done before review or can it be done after?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk