Subject: Re: [boost] ï¿½
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-13 13:21:19
On 08/13/2010 07:11 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
> We can consider that the current package has 4 libraries:
>>> * common_type for type_traits
>>> * ratio
>>> * chrono
>>> * stropwatches
>> Meaning that if it is accepted into boost there will actually be three
>> new libraries (ratio, chrono, stopwatches)?
> This is a matter of choice. Clearly common_type should goes to the TypeTraits library.
> ratio could be included as a standalone library. Whether chrono and stopwatches are separated is up to us. If the boost community consider that it is better to package them as three separated libraries, I will do the break. Do the community considers that the break need to be done before review or can it be done after?
> Any opinions?
I'd prefer two libraries:
chrono (including stopwatches)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk