Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Test Policy
From: joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-25 01:21:13

On 25/08/10 06:29, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> It always has been. While Boost.Test has some cool features, they
> don't seem to markedly improve the quality of testing in a library
> that uses Boost.Test, which mostly depends on the skill of the test
> designer. Also, if you use lightweight_test.hpp you are liable to
> continue to get useful test results even if Boost.Test should be
> broken ;-)
Note that lightweight_test is also useful to run Boost liek UT on embedded
platform where Boost.Test may not be abel to be compiled.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at