Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Boost.Process done
From: Wolfgang Fertsak (wolfgang.fertsak_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-02 02:59:02
On 01.09.2010 14:37, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Here are a couple of thoughts on how you might solve the dilemma:
> Try the Named Constructor Idiom. One can choose which behavior one wants by invoking a static member function with a suggestive name and requiring whatever arguments are appropriate and returning an instance of the class. That's often clearer than overloading constructors.
> If it is possible to determine whether a Windows app is being built as a console app versus a GUI app, then you could conditionally compile for one or the other, thus keeping a Windows developer from choosing incompatible behavior.
Sounds good, thanks!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk