Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?

Subject: Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-02 16:04:37

On 09/02/10 14:41, David Sankel wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:10 PM, David Sankel <camior_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> On the other hand, arg seems pretty reasonable.
>>
>> and how is _1  different from arg<0>?
>>
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean here. var (or arg if you like) in this library
> takes two template arguments.
> 

Initially I was confused by ths binary var, until I read:

  http://bitbucket.org/camior/de-bruijn-bind/src#cl-45

Should have done that earlier.

-Larry