Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?

Subject: Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?
From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-02 16:07:50

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:41 PM, David Sankel <camior_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:10 PM, David Sankel <camior_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> > On the other hand, arg seems pretty reasonable.
>>
>> and how is _1  different from arg<0>?
>>
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here. var (or arg if you like) in this library
> takes two template arguments.
>

Maybe you're thinking that _1 seems similar to arg<0,0> which is true until
abstractions (lambdas/binds) get nested.

-- 
David Sankel
Sankel Software
www.sankelsoftware.com
585 617 4748 (Office)