Subject: Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?
From: John Bytheway (jbytheway+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-15 18:39:36
On 15/09/10 18:55, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
> As of right now, local function will be implemented more or less using
> the following skeleton code (many thanks to John Bytheway for refining
> my global base functors trick):
You're welcome :). I will say that you may wish to switch back from
operator() to a named function (for the sake of clarity). I only
switched to operator() because I thought it would allow use of
boost::ref (which it doesn't).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk