Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Boost.Process done
From: Kim Barrett (kab.conundrums_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-19 17:25:17
On Sep 19, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Boris Schaeling wrote:
> * It might make sense to pass a string to boost::process::create_child() to specify command line options (instead of storing them one by one in a vector).
I've only been lightly following the discussion (I'm interested in the library, but presently swamped with other things), but this caught my eye. You might find boost::assign::list_of and friends to be useful for dealing with the "storing them one by one in a vector" dance.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk