Subject: Re: [boost] LLVM license compatibility with BSL
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-28 05:34:58
John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> I have found quite useful to adapt the test for llvm/libc++
>> ratio/chrono to test Boost.Ratio and Boost.Chrono.
>> But Anthony has signaled me that maybe there is a compatibility
>> problem with the license included in these files.
> The following requirement on that license:
> * Binaries derived from LLVM must reproduce the copyright notice
> (e.g. in an included readme file).
> Is incompatible with the BSL.
That was my concern. However, this is *test* code. Do we require the BSL
(or a compatible license) for the tests as well as the main library
-- Author of C++ Concurrency in Action http://www.stdthread.co.uk/book/ just::thread C++0x thread library http://www.stdthread.co.uk Just Software Solutions Ltd http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK. Company No. 5478976
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk