Re: [boost] LLVM license compatibility with BSL

Subject: Re: [boost] LLVM license compatibility with BSL
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-28 10:30:50

At Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:34:58 +0100,
Anthony Williams wrote:
> 
> John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> >> I have found quite useful to adapt the test for llvm/libc++
> >> ratio/chrono to test Boost.Ratio and Boost.Chrono.
> >> But Anthony has signaled me that maybe there is a compatibility
> >> problem with the license included in these files.
> >
> > The following requirement on that license:
> >
> > * Binaries derived from LLVM must reproduce the copyright notice
> > (e.g. in an included readme file).
> >
> > Is incompatible with the BSL.
> 
> That was my concern. However, this is *test* code. Do we require the BSL
> (or a compatible license) for the tests as well as the main library
> code?

IIRC, we require the BSL (exactly) for all code in Boost.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com