Subject: Re: [boost] LLVM license compatibility with BSL
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-28 10:30:50
At Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:34:58 +0100,
Anthony Williams wrote:
> John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> I have found quite useful to adapt the test for llvm/libc++
> >> ratio/chrono to test Boost.Ratio and Boost.Chrono.
> >> But Anthony has signaled me that maybe there is a compatibility
> >> problem with the license included in these files.
> > The following requirement on that license:
> > * Binaries derived from LLVM must reproduce the copyright notice
> > (e.g. in an included readme file).
> > Is incompatible with the BSL.
> That was my concern. However, this is *test* code. Do we require the BSL
> (or a compatible license) for the tests as well as the main library
IIRC, we require the BSL (exactly) for all code in Boost.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk