Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results

Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-07 12:27:10

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Kawulak" <robert.kawulak_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results

>> From: Paul A. Bristow
>> I also like the word 'static' - it implies 'fixed at compile time' to me,
>> but I agree static has other possible implications.
> 
> How about "statically_bounded"?

+1. But I prefer static_bounded that follows the existing static_log2, static_gcd, ... in Boost.Math.

Best,
Vicente