Subject: Re: [boost] construe_cast, call for interest and feedback
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-11 18:20:42
On 11/10/2010 22:08, Marsh Ray wrote:
> On 10/11/2010 01:23 PM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>> I think the important question is the following:
>> Do we care about C++ locales support in lexical_cast?
> Not I. If I could get std::string and std::stream without locales, I'd
> use them. (Even better might be an STL without allocators, but that's a
> different question.)
>> Are people fine scrapping lexical_cast and have construe_cast take its
> I'm not a heavy user of lexical_cast, but want to echo the concern about
> a potential increase in build times.
> I attempted a small project with Spirit once and the compile time was
> noticeable. While it was acceptable for a translation unit producing a
> high-tech parser, I wouldn't want that overhead creeping into everything
> through some seemingly innocuous string conversion functions.
I suppose it would be less of a problem if precompiled headers usage was
The template definition could be exported, too, preventing the
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk