Subject: Re: [boost] [phoenix] request for a mini-review. (Re: Phoenix as a Boost library)
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-16 19:40:36
On 10/16/2010 9:34 PM, Thomas Heller wrote:
>> Thomas is currently assessing the suggested extension point design. If
>> he likes it, it wouldn't take long to add it. The mini-review was
>> precisely to assess the Proto port---I personally would like to hear
>> feedback about the intermediate form and extensibility points since
>> that's a major new feature of Phoenix3.
> I agree. I will work on this new extension point design tonight.
> Additionally, I still would like your comments on that current
> discussions. Since it still is your library, and I don't feel very
> comfortable changing such a major part of the design without your
>> But it's your call, and you make
>> a valid point: we'd be serving a huge community by doing this sooner
>> rather than later, and I'd be happy either way.
> Yeah, people are waiting on it ... I was waiting on you to look and
> comment on my recent effots to change the intermediate form. Whenever
> a decision about that was made. It would be a matter of a few days to
> get phoenix3 ready for a mini review.
Understood. Pardon me for my long hiatus.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk