Subject: Re: [boost] Version information for Boost library
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-18 01:38:14
Edward Diener wrote:
> On 10/17/2010 5:36 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
>> At Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:31:19 -0400,
>> Edward Diener wrote:
>>> Does Boost have any policy regarding the way version information
>>> should be attached to a library ?
>> I don't even think I really understand the question. Could you be
>> more specific?
> For a given Boost library, or a library in the sandbox, what is the
> usual way of indicating to the end-user what is the version of that
> library ? I am thinking of nn.nn version number schemes, although
> nn.nn.nn.nn are more common in Windows and Linux.
> I understand that for a library which is part of the Boost
> distribution the version is essentially the distribution of Boost in which
> library is included. But if Boost does pursue a means by which
> individual libraries can be updated and distributed separately I think
> that each library needs a way to tell the end-user what "version" it
> For libraries in the sandbox, is there any usual way to indicate to
> the end-user what "version" of the library is there ?
> Obviously I can just choose my own way, which I have done, but I am
> wondering if there is some more standard Boost way which has been
I had something to say about this back in May
It didn't seem to generate much interest at the time.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk