Subject: Re: [boost] [property_tree] Copy constructor and assignment operator in xml_writer_settings class
From: mloskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-18 08:22:34
Sebastian Redl wrote:
> On 18.10.2010 12:22, mloskot wrote:
>> mloskot wrote:
>>> What is recommended or required policy regarding copy
>>> operations for types which consist of const data members, within Boost?
>>> I'm having problem with understanding why the xml_writer_settings class
>>> do not have the copying operations disabled.
> Why would it? There's nothing semantically wrong with copying a settings
> object. It's just not very useful.
Looking at the current definition , I'm not convinced.
According to C++(n3092)/12.8/25, assignment operator for this class is
deleted due to "non-static data members of const non-class type".
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org Member of ACCU, http://accu.org -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/property-tree-Copy-constructor-and-assignment-operator-in-xml-writer-settings-class-tp2992639p3000121.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk