Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exception safetyguarantee
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-19 04:06:08
On 19/10/10 09:56, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> Even if there were sufficient demand to change boost::function, that's
> not how Boost works. Each Boost library has a maintainer and once the
> library is accepted, (s)he needs to be sold on the change.
> There's also the issue that it seems a good idea to keep
> boost::function unchanged so it doesn't deviate from std::function.
can't we resort to an artifice like function2, much like signal and
signal2 coexists ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk