|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-20 18:04:43
At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:51:50 -0400,
Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> First of all, boost::function can be in an empty state for two
> reasons: either it has not been assigned a target function or there
> has been a problem with the internal target management system.
What kind of problem? Can you point to code that shows such a problem
being detected? Or are you merely saying, "somebody invoked UB
somewhere and it nulled out the pointer?" We don't need to support
the latter.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk