Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-20 18:07:14

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [1.45] Beta final schedule"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee"
In reply to: Artyom: "[boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Next in thread: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Reply: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"

At Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT),
Artyom wrote:
>
> Initial Source Code:
>
> http://art-blog.no-ip.info/files/backtrace.tar.gz
>
>
> Any interest?
> Artyom

Lots of interest, though I do have concerns about tying the
functionality to throwing an exception in any way.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [1.45] Beta final schedule"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee"
In reply to: Artyom: "[boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Next in thread: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Reply: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk