Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping withnoexceptionsafetyguarantee
From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-24 00:00:37
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 10/23/2010 5:30 PM, Domagoj Saric wrote:
> I meant simply what I said. Please explain to me why boost::function
> throwing an exception when invoked on an empty target is objectionable to
> you. If I have misunderstand to what you are objecting I apologize, but it
> seems to me that you find this behavior incorrect somehow.
The question is not directed at me, but I feel compelled to answer it.
I do find it incorrect to throw when invoked on an empty target
because I feel that this should be a contract for operator() and
contracts should be checked with asserts, which make it easier for
debugging and have no overhead (RTTI or otherwise) when compiled with
> In reading the documentation it clearly states:
> "boost::bad_function_call An exception type thrown when an instance of a
> function object is empty when invoked."
Unfortunately, breaking changes are very complicated to get in.
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk