Subject: Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?
From: Jim Bell (Jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-24 00:54:07
On 1:59 PM, Daniel Larimer wrote:
> In the code you provided I saw backtrace.hpp and backtrace.cpp, neither one provides an implementation for boost::track_trace::write_symbols, what am I missing?
I think it should be in here somewhere:
Backtrace was born from here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk