Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?
From: Jim Bell (Jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-24 00:54:07

Next message: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Previous message: Felipe Magno de Almeida: "Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping withnoexceptionsafetyguarantee"
In reply to: Daniel Larimer: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Next in thread: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"

On 1:59 PM, Daniel Larimer wrote:
> In the code you provided I saw backtrace.hpp and backtrace.cpp, neither one provides an implementation for boost::track_trace::write_symbols, what am I missing?
>

I think it should be in here somewhere:

http://cppcms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cppcms/framework/trunk/booster/booster/
http://cppcms.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cppcms/framework/trunk/booster/lib/backtrace/

Backtrace was born from here.

Next message: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Previous message: Felipe Magno de Almeida: "Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping withnoexceptionsafetyguarantee"
In reply to: Daniel Larimer: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Next in thread: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk