Subject: Re: [boost] Report # 29 (aka 1.45 blockers) is too narrow
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-25 11:50:26
On 10/25/2010 6:41 AM, Jim Bell wrote:
> So all agree that the 1.45 blockers report needs to be changed, at least
> to remove the milesone.
No, I object. That list represents bugs that the release managers have
deemed important. The bugs that random boost users deem important is
Would it be nice to go through all the bugs and make sure they're
categorized correctly? You bet. Would I hold up 1.45 for it? Nope.
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk