Subject: Re: [boost] Report # 29 (aka 1.45 blockers) is too narrow
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-26 12:01:42
On Oct 26, 2010, at 7:35 AM, Jim Bell wrote:
> On 1:59 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
>> On 10/25/2010 7:01 PM, Jim Bell wrote:
>>> Demoting a ticket's severity from showstopper would constitute evidence
>>> that it's been reviewed, but the fact that all these exist suggests that
>>> they haven't.
>> No, the fact that the bugs haven't been "accepted" is evidence that they
>> haven't been reviewed.
> Thanks for the clarifications. I wasn't aware of "accepted".
For posterity, here's a link: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/TicketWorkflow>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk