Subject: Re: [boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release, I mean)
From: Jim Bell (Jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-27 10:44:33
On 1:59 PM, Daniel James wrote:
> On 27 October 2010 03:24, Jim Bell <Jim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 1:59 PM, Marshall Clow wrote:
>>> What do people think?
>> What's the benefit of releasing 1.45 before a bug sprint?
> That's a lot of fixes. What's the benefit of not releasing them?
Thanks for the link. That's the view I was looking for!
I see thirteen libraries on the list. Are these entries submitted by
I don't want to rehash the AWOL-Authors discussion, and I realize this
is a work in progress, but only 13 libraries are represented. I presume
serialization and thread will be added, but that still seems like only a
fraction of the libraries showing yellow on the regression matrix.
Do the release managers take on library work?
Do they assess the regression matrix?
By the way, I appreciate all the work that everyone puts into boost, and
hope all my comments are taken in the good sportsmanship they're intended.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk