Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results

Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-29 13:10:03

On Oct 29, 2010, at 12:14 PM, "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>> I don't think they necessarily belong to this library but they would make a nice companion - constraints to go along with the constrained values...
> 
> Unfortunately if they are not added in the library we will need to wait for a volunter to provide someting like that as a separated library. Think for example on the Serialize library. There are two separated part archive and serialization. You could have two parts constraint and constrained_value.

Yeah, this would be a great place for such a library to start, which would be easier than starting it from scratch. I don't think Robert necessarily has to write it, though. It could be contributed as an extension.

(Please insert standard apology for suggesting work for someone else to do.)

Gordon