Re: [boost] [function] function wrappingwithnoexceptionsafetyguarantee

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrappingwithnoexceptionsafetyguarantee
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-30 18:40:30

"Emil Dotchevski" <emil_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:AANLkTimASWRoLipBTEby+peHY4zd4zguRu4PW85UeQpv_at_mail.gmail.com...

> The check and the associated overhead can be easily removed in
> boost::function. I have not seen anyone post a diff that removes the
> check in boost::function. Maybe I missed it.

Oh, I see, a technicality issue...sandbox and vault code are not good enough
to discuss...

-- 
"What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual
devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than
from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate."
Neil Postman