Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with noexceptionsafetyguarantee
From: Kazutoshi Satoda (k_satoda_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-30 19:19:29
Domagoj Saric wrote:
> this 'overhead' of a few static pointers is completely insignificant
> compared to various related code bloat issues...
That should be true. But unfortunately, the overhead of static pointers
are actually significant while they are not const, at least for me.