Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with noexceptionsafetyguarantee
From: Kazutoshi Satoda (k_satoda_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-30 19:19:29
Domagoj Saric wrote:
> this 'overhead' of a few static pointers is completely insignificant
> compared to various related code bloat issues...
That should be true. But unfortunately, the overhead of static pointers
are actually significant while they are not const, at least for me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk