Re: [boost] [function] new implementation

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] new implementation
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-30 20:52:04

"Lars Viklund" <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:20101030132800.GJ22859_at_hatchepsut.acc.umu.se...

> Quick tests show that (assuming I have grafted it into my 1.44 tree
> properly), this "drop-in" replacement does not work on neither VisualAge
> C/C++ 11.1 and SunStudio 12 (Sun C++ 5.9).

I would expect that the proposed code does not yet compile on the more 
defficient compilers as I first focused on getting a version working on more 
recent/more compliant compilers. As such there are certainly still places in 
code that rely on/use things like SFINAE and 'too-optimistic' use of 
integral constant compile time logic that is known to choke weaker 
compilers. When I get the time I will do some cleaning things up in this 
regard, however I unfortunately do not have access to the platforms you 
mentioned...but if you are interested and are willing to help maybe we can 
solve the issues you face ;)

-- 
"What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual
devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than
from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate."
Neil Postman