Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and (Microsoft's) _SECURE_SCL
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-03 15:15:44
> Is HID=1 SCL=0 ever possible in past versions?
That's the case that I refer to as "the oddball". It can be requested, but it behaves like HID=1 SCL=1 as far as binary compatibility is concerned. They both perform exhaustive correctness checks and trigger debug assertion dialogs. They may differ on what happens if those dialogs are ignored.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk