Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] new implementation
From: Lars Viklund (zao_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-03 15:07:27

Next message: Stephan T. Lavavej: "Re: [boost] Boost and (Microsoft's) _SECURE_SCL"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] Bug-fix volunteers: risks, downsides?"
In reply to: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [function] new implementation"
Next in thread: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [function] new implementation"
Reply: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [function] new implementation"

On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 03:30:37PM +0100, Domagoj Saric wrote:
> If you find the time/will to try again with VisualAge and SunStudio
> please send me the full compiler output if it still does not work...maybe
> I can fix it solely from that...

Grafting your function from sandbox r66384 into boost trunk r66339, I
get the attached compiler outputs for the attached program.

-- 
Lars Viklund | zao_at_[hidden]

text/plain attachment: vacpp.log

text/plain attachment: CC510.log

text/plain attachment: foo.cc

Next message: Stephan T. Lavavej: "Re: [boost] Boost and (Microsoft's) _SECURE_SCL"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] Bug-fix volunteers: risks, downsides?"
In reply to: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [function] new implementation"
Next in thread: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [function] new implementation"
Reply: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [function] new implementation"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk