Subject: [boost] [inspect] added new check for C-style assert macro (was: [property_tree][showstopper][1.45] missing include in string_path.hpp)
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-11 18:08:11
On 11/11/2010 3:49 PM, Sebastian Redl wrote:
> On 11.11.2010, at 21:38, Eric Niebler wrote:
>> If BOOST_ASSERT is *always* to be preferred over C's assert macro,
>> then we should probably add that to the inspection report, right?
> That would probably a good idea.
I just modified the inspect tool to check for the presence of C-style
assert in Boost code. Everybody should be using BOOST_ASSERT. (Right?)
Here's the result of running the new check over Boost trunk:
Beman, the inspection report looks like it was last run in June. What's up?
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk