Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library ofhas_operator_xxx

Subject: Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library ofhas_operator_xxx
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-17 15:36:30

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frédéric Bron" <frederic.bron_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library ofhas_operator_xxx

> One thing that I've either found useful is to have an additional template
> parameter in addition to the parameter types and the return type, which is a
> Boost.MPL metapredicate intended to be applied to the actual result of the
> operation.

This would make type_traits library depend on the MPL library. Is it desirable?

Frédéric
_______________________________________________

I don't see the problem, as it depends already.

Vicente