Subject: Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library of has_operator_xxx
From: Frédéric Bron (frederic.bron_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-17 15:02:29
> One thing that I've either found useful is to have an additional template
> parameter in addition to the parameter types and the return type, which is a
> Boost.MPL metapredicate intended to be applied to the actual result of the
This would make type_traits library depend on the MPL library. Is it desirable?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk