Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 1.45 compile error
From: Peder Holt (peder.holt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-20 10:24:07


2010/11/20 Vicente BOTET <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>

> > Message du 20/11/10 14:52
> > De : "Eric Niebler"
> > A : boost_at_[hidden]
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [boost] Boost 1.45 compile error
> >
> > On 11/20/2010 7:25 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> > >>>> This sounds bad. Can anybody confirm?
> > >>>
> > >>> The tests already confirm it .
> > >>
> > >> Crap. Might I suggest we pull the release and reissue as a point
> release
> > >> after this is fixed?
> > >>
> > >> Adding back the missing context:
> > >
> > > Is this type_traits specific, or should boost.typeof work on that
> > > platform... I'm sure it used to?
> >
> > I don't know. Is common_type the only trait to use boost.typeof? If so,
> > can we just comment out the #include of common_type.hpp in
> > type_traits.hpp as a stop-gap?
> >
> > > BTW there are a *lot* of failures with VC7.1 relating to this.
>
> Most of the failures if not all are due to the includion of
> common_type.hpp.
>
> > By "this" do you mean the type_traits error or the boost.typeof failure?
> >
>
> As Boost.Typeof is Ok with this compiler we can not say yet that the
> problem is with Boost.Typeof.
> Surprisingly the same compiler in trunk works "daw-msvc71 rev 66640 Fri,
> 19 02:00:37 +0000i msvc- 7.1"
>
> daw-msvc71 rev 66641 Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:00:32 +0000i fails on release.
>
> From my part we can comment the #inlcude for common_type from the
> type_traits.hpp file. Applications that want to use common_type can include
> for the moment.
>
>
I will install Visual Studio 2003 ASAP and try to see if there is something
obviously wrong with boost.typeof for this compiler.

Regards
Peder

> Best,
> Vicente
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk