Subject: Re: [boost] Sandbox cleanup
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-29 12:44:57
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of Edward Diener
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 3:14 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Sandbox cleanup
> On 11/29/2010 3:27 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Folks,
> > it appears that at present, our SVN sandbox is in fairly confused
> > state. A fresh checkout contains objects of very different kinds, in
> > Comments?
> Only that developers should use the correct structure, where the /boost
> /libs subdirectories exist under each individual library, and that their
> be many libraries in the sandbox that are obsolete in the sense that the
> already in Boost but files are still lying around in the sandbox.
> How and if the latter can be cleaned up I have no idea. As for the former,
> Boost should enforce the fact that individual libraries must use their own
> and /libs subdirectory since the general /boost and /libs directories will
> removed at some future date and all the libraries within these directories
> moved to their own individual library.
> I too find the sandbox to be pretty messy, but I find it even more
> proprosers of possible libraries to Boost put their code in some other
> place on the Internet rather than in the sandbox.
> So it would be nice if the sandbox could be regularized and cleaned up.
It would be *very* nice if every library followed the correct structure so
it can be moved
easily to trunk or a release download.
I believe the current hassle involved in this is a real impediment to
So I think we should begin to make 'tough' noises ;-)
Perhaps one the Boost.Guild people could take it on themselves to start by
contacting offending authors?
And a full description for would-be/existing author of *exactly* what the
structure must be (with examples) would be good too.
Being able to provide a link to a 'how-to' documentation might resolve the
obvious confusion about this.
(Aside: The structure seems quite dotty to me - perhaps someone can provide
But even if that rationale is lost in the mists of time, we have a standard,
and a standard is what we must all follow, however peculiar.)
--- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk