Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] On shared_mutex
From: Howard Hinnant (howard.hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-29 14:26:03
On Nov 29, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Anthony Williams wrote:
>> Thanks, I believe this means we're down to only two red arrows! :-)
> And those are the two arrows I think we should not allow (S->U and
to color only the two disputed arrows red (the omissions are now purple). And I've updated the example code showing use of a disputed try-conversion from shared to exclusive locking. The newer example is I hope more motivating for the existence of the conversion.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk