Subject: Re: [boost] [Bug Sprint] Final report for the (late 2010) Bug Sprint
From: Anthony Williams (anthony.ajw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-07 08:26:24
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 12/6/2010 9:22 AM, Marshall Clow wrote:
>>> So - what did people think went well during the bug sprint?
>>> What went poorly?
>>> What can we do better next time (assuming that there is a next time)?
>> I think it proves that people are too busy around the holidays for a bug
> Agreed. For me, the number of distractions seemed to double or triple.
> I think the bug sprints are quite valuable. Their timing, however, is
Agreed. I've participated in the last two, but didn't in this one
because I've got too much else on.
-- Author of C++ Concurrency in Action http://www.stdthread.co.uk/book/ just::thread C++0x thread library http://www.stdthread.co.uk Just Software Solutions Ltd http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK. Company No. 5478976
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk