Subject: Re: [boost] [OT] Open Source Forking and Boost (was Re: [SQL-Connectivity] Is Boost interested in CppDB?)
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-16 05:14:27
> I agree with you, but getting the current maintainers -- who are
> technically, not maintaining the libraries -- to yield maintenance at
> least to the whole community (or to a larger set of contributors)
> hasn't been "proven" yet at least for Boost. I know Boost.Thread had
> been taken over successfully before, that precedent required having to
> track down the (sole) original maintainer, getting him to agree and
> yield to a specific person, sounds like a lot of work compared to just
> people clicking a button to "fork". :D
Boost.Thread was only complicated because of license issues, for a library
that's under the BSL, the original maintainer can hardly complain if someone
takes it over (with the consent of the mailing list) while they're AWOL.
Just my 2c... John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk