Subject: Re: [boost] [Fusion] begin/end ADL issues with C++0x range-based for
From: Michel MORIN (mimomorin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-21 01:42:23
Michel MORIN wrote:
>> If boost::begin/end doesn't need to be found via ADL,
>> then use ADL barrier technique to boost::begin/end.
> Oooops, I made a mistake!
> Definitely, solution B is not a choice.
> It diables Boost-interfaced range from using in range-based for.
Oops, again. Solution B is not a choice, but the reason is wrong.
B does not solve the problem, because there are still ambiguity
between std::begin/end and boost::fusion::begin/end.
Sorry for the noise.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk